Skip to main content

Gem Lore

Cardinal gems



Humans like shiny things, so much so that English has expressions like "all that glitters is not gold" to remind us that those shiny things may not be valuable. I'm sure other languages have an equivalent expression. So it really shouldn't be a surprise that we have a lot of lore and legends surrounding the various gemstones.

Most legends about gems tend to be positive and focus on their healing or protective aspects. Claude Lecouteux notes in his lapidary of sacred stones that "A statistical analysis of the specific powers of stones reveals that these are unevenly distributed between two poles, one consisting of purely magical properties (5%) or protective properties (30%), and the other of therapeutic properties (65%)"1(the Hope Diamond is a notable exception. It is said to be cursed, though this has been thought to be a marketing campaign for publicity rather than an actual legend).

These purported powers are pulled from the gem by various methods, including engraving certain symbols, ingesting, touching/wearing, or seeing. Stones could also be used as part of other spells/charms/rituals, though it's debatable whether this was thought to be a property of the stone or the result of combination with a plant/herb/oil/etc.

Gem lore as a concept spans across cultures, though no gem seems to have the same property in all cultures. A myriad of properties are attributed to a given stone and Lecouteux notes that "A stone never possesses only a single virtue. As the centuries go by and traditions from other lands are discovered, the number of its properties continues to grow."2


____


1. Lecouteux, Claude. A Lapidary of Sacred Stones: Their Magical and Medicinal Powers Based on the Earliest Sources (pp. 9-10). Inner Traditions/Bear & Company. Kindle Edition.  

2. Lecouteux, Claude. A Lapidary of Sacred Stones: Their Magical and Medicinal Powers Based on the Earliest Sources (p. 13). Inner Traditions/Bear & Company. Kindle Edition.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Nyx, the goddess of night

Not being one of the 12 Olympians, Nyx is a relatively unknown goddess with little lore or legends about her. Most of what we have are descriptions of her from other deities, though what we do know is fascinating. Even for a goddess, she was ancient, being among the first children of Chaos and the mother of many who unfortunately ended up more well known than her. That is perhaps why she was such a powerful goddess. Her age and her legacy made her fearsome. While we don't know much, what we do know is that she was strong. Strong enough to terrify Zeus, who was himself obviously exceedingly powerful and feared. In Homer's Illiad 8.15-20 it explicitly states about Zeus' strength: ἐξάπτεσθε θεοὶ πᾶσαί τε θέαιναι: ἀλλ᾽ οὐκ ἂν ἐρύσαιτ᾽ ἐξ οὐρανόθεν πεδίον δὲ Ζῆν᾽ ὕπατον μήστωρ᾽, οὐδ᾽ εἰ μάλα πολλὰ κάμοιτε. ἀλλ᾽ ὅτε δὴ καὶ ἐγὼ πρόφρων ἐθέλοιμι ἐρύσσαι, αὐτῇ κεν γαίῃ ἐρύσαιμ᾽ αὐτῇ τε θαλάσσῃ: σειρὴν μέν κεν ἔπειτα περὶ ῥίον Οὐλύμποιο δησαίμην, τὰ δέ κ᾽ αὖτε μετήορα πάντα γένοι...

Circe's Powers

Circe, the female entity that attempted to trap Odysseus on his journey home, is an interesting figure who seems to occupy two worlds. The Oxford Classical Dictionary specifically calls her “powerful sorceress” 1 and she is called “goddess” a few times ( Odyssey 11.9 and 12.21). This sets her apart from other goddesses in the story because most of her actions come from the sorceress aspect, not the goddess. The nature of her magic, with it requiring touch to work and it being the only time in the Odyssey where this concept is used, lets her be viewed in a different light than, for example, Athena. For Circe, sorcery is her drugs and potions, which are called “bewitching” several times( Odyssey 10.339, 349) and her wand, which is called “magic”( Odyssey 10.314). Hermes also refers to what she does with drugs as a “magic spell”( Odyssey 10.311) when he gives Odysseus the herb. She does with sorcery what other goddesses would simply do as a result of them being goddess...

Satan

Let’s talk about Satan, because why not? The entity that became the Satan of the New Testament and Christianity as a whole has its basis in the Old Testament. Note: basis. But it didn’t exist there in anything resembling the form that it took in later centuries. In the Old Testament, Satan is not a name like it tends to be used today. It’s just a word meaning “adversary”. In Hebrew, this is שָׂטָן and does not refer to this entity specifically. It is used multiple times thoughout the Old Testament to refer to multiple things. At one point, an angel of the lord was explicity referred to as שָׂטָן (Numbers 22:22). It seems like a general word for anything in the way. So, it is not necessarily clear what the entity is, though it is implied that it has some relation to the בְּנֵי הָאֱלֹהִים, the sons of God (Job 1:6). The text does not specify exactly what it is, but makes it sound like a sort of cosmic pest in a celestial court, something under complete control of the Elohim. Everything i...